This week we read about the
effectiveness of technology in the classroom, constructivism which, as a
perspective in education, explains how knowledge is constructed in the human
being when information comes into contact with existing knowledge that had been
developed by experiences. One of our readings covered Connectivism too, which
deals with the theory of learning which emphasizes the role of the social and
cultural context.
Other readings and videos focused on
social networking, technologies in education, how people learn through brain,
mind, experience and school and a number of other tech. education related
articles. I think the one that got me most was the cyborg theory. Implanting
chips and hooking up wires and cables to your nervous system………..made me
nervous! That was crazy, crazy madness. It’s sometimes mind blowing to see
where technology has come from, where it is now, and where it’ll be in the near
future.
In Using Technology with Classroom
Instruction That Works, (Ringstaff & Kelley, 2002; Schacter, 1999),
explains; Why Technology. Research indicates that technologies used in the
classroom can have an additional positive influence on student learning when
the learning goals are clearly articulated prior to the technology’s use. (p.
3) Applied effectively, technology
implementation not only increases student learning, understanding, and
achievement but also augments motivation to learn, encourages collaborative
learning, and supports the development of critical thinking and problem-solving
skills (Schacter & Fagnano, 1999). Russell and Sorge (1999) also point to
how technology can give students “more control over their own learning,”
facilitating the analytical and critical thinking and the collaboration
championed in the constructivist approach to education (pp. 1-2).
I can truly see where all the above
statements are so on point. If applied effectively, there can be an increase in
student achievement .
Students will be more prone to participate, become more “self-thinkers”, and
analyze problems more critically. However, it is very hard to accomplish these
goals if our educators are not prepared. I think this is the main point. We all
know that this society is 100% tech driven; our students are 100% on board, but
so many of our educator’s feel they are being left behind. They see the
technology, they like what it can do, but as far as its uses in the classroom,
so many are clueless. If we can provide appropriate training, to our educators
the achievements will be many and great.
Abbott, J. (nd). Building Knowledge:
Constructivism in Learning. [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F00R3pOXzuk
McPheeters,
D. (2009, March). Social networking technologies in education. Tech and
Learning, 29(8).Retrieved from http://www.techlearning.com/article/16250
Pitler, H., Hubbell, E., Kuhn, M.,
& Malenoski, K. (2007). Using technology with classroom instruction that
works. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development,
Introduction, 1 – 14.
Siemens, G. (nd). The Changing
Nature of Knowledge [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMcTHndpzYg
Solomon,
G., & Schrum, L. (2007). Web 2.0: New tools, new schools. Eugene, OR:
International Society for Technology in Education, 7-44.
Southwest
Educational Development Laboratory, (1999). Learning as a personal event: A
brief introduction to constructivism. Retrieved from http://www.sedl.org/pubs/tec26/intro2c.html
Sprague,
D. & Dede, C. (1999). If I teach this way, Am I doing my job:
Constructivism in the classroom. Leading and Learning, 27(1). Retrieved
from the International Society for Technology in Education at http://imet.csus.edu/imet9/280/docs/dede_constructivisim.pdf
Warwirk,
K. (nd). Cyborg Life [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RB_l7SY_ngI
No comments:
Post a Comment